NCIS: Los Angeles season 11 episode 22 Recap and FAQ
Episode Summary
In the aftermath of a strike mission, tensions rise within the NCIS team as they grapple with a delicate case involving Chief Petty Officer Thomas Argento, accused by fellow SEALs of committing a war crime. The team, particularly Sam and Callen, must navigate the treacherous moral landscape and complex military justice system, uncovering unsettling truths about Argento's service. In Afghanistan, they face Argento's far-reaching influence and the daunting task of gathering direct evidence, all while dealing with the personal and professional repercussions of pursuing truth and justice in a case that challenges their very principles.
Full Episode S11E22 Recap
Frequently Asked Questions
Who are Stevens, Garcia, and Levine?
Stevens, Garcia, and Levine are team members responsible for securing the perimeter during the strike mission aftermath.
What is the mood in the NCIS office during the banter scene?
The mood is light-hearted and filled with teasing about personal life and domestic habits.
Who is Lieutenant Colonel MacKenzie?
Lieutenant Colonel MacKenzie is a character who brings urgent news about a delicate and disturbing case involving Chief Petty Officer Thomas Argento.
What are the allegations against Chief Petty Officer Thomas Argento?
Chief Petty Officer Thomas Argento is accused by two Navy SEALs of murdering an unarmed Taliban prisoner, which is considered a war crime.
Why are Sam and Callen specifically requested for the case involving Argento?
Sam and Callen are requested due to Sam's reputation and respect within the SEAL teams.
How do Kendricks and Barr feel about making the accusations against Argento?
Kendricks and Barr are hesitant and fearful, understanding the gravity and potential consequences of accusing a fellow SEAL.
What unusual details are uncovered about Argento's service?
Argento's service details are unusual, including his untrained sniper kills and his tendency to work alone without witnesses.
What challenges does the team face in Afghanistan?
In Afghanistan, the team faces Argento's influence, the challenge of gathering direct evidence, and the complexity of military justice and international law.
How does the team react to the complexity and moral dilemmas of the case?
The team is committed to truth and justice but is tested by the difficult decisions and potential repercussions of the case.
What is the critical point the narrative builds up to?
The narrative builds up to a confrontation that could redefine the characters' understanding of duty, honor, and justice.